Wednesday, January 9, 2013

If not Impeachment, What?

Sobered and deeply troubled by the election debacle on November 6th, and mindful that, over the next four years, Obama and his Progressive minions are now more determined than ever to completely undermine what precious little remains of this Republic, it becomes crystal-clear that a genial solution to our nation's challenges is likekly impossible.

So, what can we do? Well, I think we can eliminate impeachment as a realistic remedy.

Bear in mind that impeachment (indictment) is a political--not a legal--process. A majority in the House of Representatives can impeach, but  2/3 of the Senate (trial) is required to convict and remove a sitting President. And because it is such an onerous and highly politicized process, only two Chief Executives, Andrew Johnson and William Clinton, have ever been impeached, though, significantly, neither of them was convicted and removed from office.

Given the extensive Progressive contagion which has swept DC, both on the left and the right, the chances of successfully applying this two-step process is, therefore, very, very remote. As things now stand, it appears only a flagrant act of presidential treason or murder would persuade the House and Senate to respectively impeach and remove Obama.

Briefly, despite deliberate and all too often successful political attempts over the years to misinterpret the meaning of  "high crimes and misdemeanors", my research manifestly renders Obama both impeachable and removable. Why? We must remember that "high crimes and misdemeanors" aren't restricted to murder and treason. In fact, our Founders considered mal-administration, breach of public trust, abuse of power, negligence and, yes, even immoral behavior, among others, as impeachable offenses.

In essence, an impeachable offense is not necessarily an indictable offense and an indictable offense is not necessarily an impeachable offense. Simply put, an impeachable offense is WHATEVER Congress may say it is at any given time.

That said, I refer you to Canada Free Press which has creditably kept track of Obama's impeachable offenses--50+, so far. As of today, we may be able to add several others, among those being Benghazigate (selling arms to Islamists) and committing US military assets to Libya without Congressional approval. Thus, while the CFP list is hardly exhaustive, it fairly highlights some of the more egregious offenses so far committed by this imperial president. In their totality, these offenses are breathtaking in scope and seriousness. But, again, ONLY if the House indicts, and ONLY if the Senate convicts can this smug imperial ideologue be removed.

From my lowly vantage point, Obama is, hands-down,  the most impeachable chief executive in our nation's history. And because he is constitutionally ineligible for re-election in 2016--this despite an odious proposal by Congressman Jose Serrano (D-NY 15th), member of the Democratic Socialists of America,  to eliminate presidential term limits--short of impeachment, conviction or incapacity we have only our God-given natural and constitutional rights of resistance, e.g. civil disobedience, nullification, secession and rebellion, to shield us from Obama's brazen utopian transformation of this union and to prevent our slide into economic oblivion. And to rely on the federal courts to support the Constitution against this Progressive thug is extremely doubtful.

So, yes, folks, sorry to say, but the remedy is now squarely on our shoulders and on the shoulders of our respective States to resist. We can rely on nothing else. Wishful thinking, benign neglect, and prayers alone won't turn the tide and save this country. And with both our 1st and 2nd Amendment rights under attack, now more than ever patriots need to be solidly united. Are we up to it? That remains to be seen...

2 comments:

  1. In light of the increased number of foreign born people joining our military forces, how much can we trust the military to refuse unlawful orders to move against us? I fear the military will be divided with a large number that do not truly understand freedom obeying the orders of the socialists now controlling the government while others may fear to refuse to obey the illegal orders. A lot depends on the officer corp. Remember though that Douglas MacArthur ordered troops to fire on the unarmed WW1 vets that marched peaceably on Washington trying to get the bonus that was promised them but never delivered. Many of the vets were killed or wounded The lack of a draft or some type of compulsory military service, such as Israel has, is responsible for our young citizens being untutored in the use of firearms. As a result they will be no match against the trained, well armed soldiers that move against them. Many of which will be wearing the blue helmet of the UN. The older combat veterans that can still pull a trigger are mostly out of shape and over weight and have no training with the new technically superior weapons of today's military. I am an 80 year old Korean vet (1950-51)and have my M1 Garand but will be only good for a short time when they come for my guns. I will take a few with me but I won't win any battles. We need to educate our soldiers and marines on the Constitution that they swore to defend. Without them on our side we are surely going to live under the oppression of the commie/socialists. Most of us support the troops but do 100% of the troops support us?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Citizen soldiers, you and me, and the Nat'l Guard, essentially our neighbors, will not turn against us. Of that I am certain. The upper echelon of the officer corps is politicized and unreliable. But, the armed vets, your neighbors and the Nat'l Guard are 99% behind us.

    I am really impressed that at 80 you're still so feisty and committed to the Constitution. You're to be commended.

    Don't give up, man. There are MILLIONS of us out here. In unity there is strength.

    ReplyDelete