Tasked by the FBI to provide "informational analysis" on conditions which could be construed as potentially harmful to civil order and national security, InfraGard, of the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC), issued an unclassifed Protective Intelligence Communicatiion report in March 2009 regarding the "crescendo" of public concern about Mr. Obama's presidential eligibility.
Authored by Dr. Lyle J. Rapacki, Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent, the report summarizes the substance of legal challenges to Mr. Obama on the question of his constitutional eligibility and concludes that if it "should be discovered Mr. Obama is ineligible, a constitutional crisis would ensue attempting to determine which of his executive branch orders should be valid." It goes on to warn that "if...Mr. Obama fights revealing his documentation, there is growing concern of civil unrest, or worse, being unleashed in the streets of our nation. The economic crisis coupled with this type of a constitutional crisis could prove to be a flashpoint that would test conventional law enforcement and elements of homeland security."
The stream of law suits, the most recent of which have been tendered by high ranking military officers and state legislators, to compel Obama to prove his eligibility have been unremitting and increasingly vocal. A request for "quo warranto" action, an apparent last-ditch legal remedy, was recently delivered to both the US Attorney for the District of Columbia and to the Attorney General.
Dovetailing with this unsettling assessment, and pretty much out of public view, are the following national security developments which, in their totality, could well signal acute domestic instability in the period ahead.
Upon the recommendation of the Army's Strategic Studies Institute, The Army Times reported that a somewhat euphemistically dubbed "Consequence Management Response Force (CCMRF)", currently the role of the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team, but which, reportedly, might eventually comprise upwards of 80,000 troops, is being trained and readied to deal with what could be widespread civil disorder resulting from an "unforeseen economic collapse" or "loss of a functional political and legal order."
Symptomatic of festering civil unrest are the many "tea parties" springing up around the country, growing fears of economic disintegration and of both crippling terrorist attacks and even of perceived federal overreaching. Add to this the very real threat of a rogue nuclear EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) attack on the homeland which could instantaneously reduce the country to a paralytic pre-industrial condition, plus the unrest on our southern border, and there appears to be ample and justifiable cause for concern and appropriate contingency planning at every level of government.
Clearly, a perfect storm could, indeed, be brewing. Thus, it is only prudent that we are all properly prepared. Boy, we sure live in an intensely interesting time. Wow!
2012 IN THE BAG!
-
Will most Americans leave their community herds and think as individuals
during the upcoming election season, or remain emotionally committed to
their fear...
14 hours ago

2 comments:
Hi Jim,
A word, if I may, about Lyle Rapacki. He has a demonstrated talent for, not to put it too delicately, making stuff up.
Take a look at the story entitled "The Truth About Lyle Rapacki" by Vicki Copeland. (http://www.holysmoke.org/wicca/cwr2-04.htm)
An excerpt:
"He is not now, nor has he ever been, on the faculty of the Arizona State Supreme Court. After a lengthy correspondence between Mr. Rapacki and the Court, he signed an agreement which stated in part that he agreed to, 'Immediately cease and desist from using or making any reference, written, verbal, or otherwise, regarding any past, present or possible future association with the Arizona Supreme Court ... cease and desist from representing that he at any time had any faculty status with the ... Arizona Supreme Court. To immediately delete from any and all correspondence and publications any reference to any association with the Arizona Supreme Court...' (Agreement between Arizona Supreme Court and Lyle J. Rapacki, dated April 24, 1989.)"
We live in serious times, and men like Rapacki have nothing beneficial to add to the important business of the Nation if all they can do is leverage falsified credentials to try and prey on the emotions of others.
Yours as always,
Victor
Hi, Victor!
Haven't seen you on the circuit of late.
As for Rapacki, I understood the purpose of his report was to "stimulate thought and discussion". Nothing wrong with that. And whether he is a knave of the highest order doesn't seem very relevant. His assessment, whether it be for private consumption or at the behest of a gov't agency, is only that. An assessment. We can take it or leave it. For me, the assessment was very plausible and not at all bowl-'ya-over ground-breaking or surprising.
What do you think of those Common Law Grand Jury actions? You have to hand it to them. They don't give up easily. Lot's of persistence and diligence. And I honestly believe the vast majority of them are genuine patriots. And for that, we all owe them a debt of gratitude.
Cheers!
Post a Comment