Mark Levin has an intriguing opinion as to why the New York Times may have showcased a story on the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play "Uranium One" scandal.
Since no fewer than seven Cabinet secretaries formally chopped off on the "Uranium One" deal, Levin rightly points out that culpability extends far beyond just Bill & Hillary.
Levin opines that to divert attention from the Obama Administration for its central part in this nefarious uranium deal with the Russians, the left-leaning NYT pointed the finger at Hillary and Bill alone, altogether ignoring the fact that the Obama Administration formally approved the deal.
For Levin, the big story is that this scandal--every bit as abominable as Teapot Dome--is, in actuality, an Administration scandal of the first order--and no one is talking about it!
Sounds very plausible to me.
Muslim University Student in Canada Refuses to Do Course Work with Women - Here's the thing: why come and live in a Western country when it is the sharia you wish to live under? Why attend Western universities when you want to live ...
1 year ago