CATHOLIC ABORTIONISTS TOLERATED BY CHURCH LEADERS

So, among other CINOs (Catholic in Name Only), why hasn't the Catholic Church denied Cuomo (the nation's preeminent abortionist) communion or excommunicated him? Aside from the obvious, that being that the well-healed and elite tend to routinely overlook each others sins, but assuming for a moment that this view is in error, my burning question remains. WHY?

A conscientious Christian should properly question why Cuomo has not been properly disciplined and denied Holy Communion by Albany Bishop Edward Scharfenberger, or by New York's Cardinal Timothy Dolan. And while we may not like the well-spun answer we get, my question remains of critical importance.

Surely Bishop Scharfenberger is aware of the Catholic Church's Code of Canon Law, Code 915: "Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion."

Or could it be that even some Christian leaders are falling under the spell of Marxism. Years of Progressive PC and related indoctrination may have taken a larger toll than we had ever thought possible. Take our health care, our education, our guns, but once they've subverted our religious tenets we are virtually finished, reduced to insentient and obedient drones. It would appear that the Socialist Democrats are no longer merely pushing the envelope; they are now ruthlessly shoving the envelope down our collective throats. Welcome to Dystopia.

KHRUSCHEV A PROPHET?

“For us in Russia, communism is a dead dog, while for many people in the West, it is still a living lion.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize winning Russian novelist and historian).

Well, of this we can all be certain. With the nurturing of this country's Socialist Democrat Party, Marxism is definitely on the rise in America. The ol' Communist murderers and dictators in Hell must be laughing their collective butts off. Today, Khruschev's 50's warning that Communism will bury the USA seems more than an idle threat. The lingering question is, what will we do substantively to stop our transformation and collapse?

INELIGIBILITY ISSUE: Shoot the Messenger and Do the Research Yourself

SO VERY TEDIOUS. INELIGIBILITY DENIERS ARE ALREADY CASTIGATING THOSE OF US WHO UNDERSTAND THAT OBAMA, CRUZ, RUBIO AND NOW KAMALA HARRIS ARE CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OR VP. Honestly, folks, it's not rocket science. When I read this maddening article and caught the scent of arrogant dismissiveness and disregard for original meaning, I left these brief comments with the likely foolish hope that at least one of these purveyors of misinformation would honestly and objectively research the matter a little. Anyway, my brief comments, for whatever good they do to anyone:

"It's incredible and deeply frustrating how misinformed folks are about the real meaning of natural born citizen and citizen. HUGE constitutional difference. A modicum of serious research on line would be both enlightening and liberating. For starters, check out federalistblog, then Publius Huldah blog. So much solid evidence that Obama, Rubio, Cruz and, yes, super elitist Kamala are, hands down, ineligible. The Constitution cannot defend itself; that is up to us. But, today who the hell cares about that dusty, inconvenient parchment, huh? Obviously, not many at all..."

'“(A)ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."' Sadly, the ineligibility deniers will cavalierly and dishonestly blow this off too. Truth interferes with their preconceived viewpoints. And so goes a once venerable and genuine constitutional republic. Maddening."

"If any alien/visitor drops by the US and is somehow adjudged to be 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof', then all American travelers abroad are similarly and completely subject to the jurisdiction of those governments as well. As such, there would be no need for American Embassies to protect them. Sojourners are, of course, required to follow the laws of the countries they visit/pass through, but in no way are they subject to that country's jurisdiction or otherwise afforded those protections reserved to legal residents and citizens. If you want to break new ground and jettison the academic flavor of the month, then read the words of Sens. Trumbell, Howard, and Bingham regarding citizenship, natural born citizenship and the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". These are the guys who wrote the 14th amendment. Can't get more authoritative than that, huh? But, who cares, right? Our own personal agendas and frivolous preconceived viewpoints are far more important."

About this website

WESTERNJOURNAL.COM|BY BENJAMIN ARIE

Kamala Harris Shouldn't Be President, But Not Because She Isn't 'Eligible'

Some on the right are questioning Harris' constitutional ability to run for president, but the evidence says she's in the clear ... but still bad for America.

The Constitution's 10th Amendment Cannot Enforce Itself

True, Mr. Jefferson. But, tragically, you and the framers never fully anticipated elective offices morphing into career paths, and sovereign States being forcibly and/or financially enticed to accept their transformation into vassals of the federal government, each State government a sordid microcosm of its master in DC.

Yes, Mr. Jefferson, modern Americans have managed to flip you and your compatriots' best laid plan, the Constitution, on its head. But you and your illustrious colleagues, understanding human nature, DID foresee the very real possibility, indeed the inevitability, of this republic's being reduced to that of an oligarchy or dictatorship. You were dead to rights on that prediction.

In any event, sir, I sincerely thank you and your fellow patriots for expending so much effort and blood to establish what you had hoped to have been a durable constitutional republic. And, you must admit, unlike many of you who divined the end of the republic by 1825 or thereabouts, we have miraculously managed to limp along into the 21st century, of course as anything but a genuine constitutional republic--oh, the trappings of a republic, for sure, but a faint replica nonetheless.

So, State Nullification, an otherwise common sense and natural remedy to check federal tyranny is, today, an unrealistic hope. The People and their respective States have long ago surrendered their sovereignty and faithfulness to first principles, all for a few pieces of federal silver.

So you good folks showed us the way, but we foolishly veered left. The fault is not yours; it is ours.

Solution to Border Problem: ENFORCE EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAW

HEADLINE: "Man Who Allegedly Stabbed Father of Seven to Death Had Been Deported SIX Times"

Folks, we don't need "comprehensive immigration reform" (a misleading aphorism employed by open borders types) to fix our immigration problems. We need to ENFORCE existing law and rid ourselves of faithless agenda-driven federal judges who routinely and blatantly undermine the law as it is.

In this case, and like so so many other such cases, Title 8 Section 1325 applies. Deported SIX times, this guy is subject to Sec 1325 which renders illegal entry a misdemeanor carrying with it imprisonment for 6 months for the first offense, and a FELONY and minimum 2 years imprisonment for the second offense. Clearly, we are not enforcing current law. That's the problem.

Right or Left: The Home of the "Isms" Clarified

SO TIRED OF LEFTIES LABELING THE RIGHT AS NAZIS. Talk about psychological projection, huh? Insufferably stupid as well! Just so we are all clear on this, below I've summarized where Fascists, Socialists, Nazis and Communists fall on the political spectrum.

We often hear people parroting words to the effect that communists & socialists are “left” wing, and the NAZIS are “right” wing. Rubbish.

The lie that NAZIS are “right wing” has been disseminated in order to deceive the unthinking.

The German NAZIS and the American neo-NAZIS are NOT “far right”!

“NAZI” is the acronym for “National sozialistiche Deutsche Arbeiterpartei”. The literal English translation is, “national SOCIALIST German workers’ party”.

**The NAZIS were socialists! They were “national” socialists, as contrasted with Marx & Engels who were “international” socialists. But, socialists all.

NAZIS have been called “far right” in order to sabotage the thinking of the American people. This is how the sabotage works: The Communists are “far left”. The NAZIS are “far right”. Gee! I better be in the middle – a moderate! (Meaning I stand for nothing.)

So under this false model, both “extremes” are presented as bad. Only the moderate middle is good. And the best alternative to such extremes, that being limited constitutional government, is not even mentioned. How convenient.

In truth, extreme right entails anarchy, or the absence of government altogether. Whereas the extreme left, which is in thrall of big government, entails all the notorious isms.

Collectivism with all its variants (communism, fascism, Nazism, Fabian socialism, syndicalism, etc.) are all on the same side [collectivism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, terror, & government tyranny]. The distinctions between these variants are only minor and technical.

The alternative to all of them is limited constitutional civil government – such as our Framers gave us.

The above explanation, which should be obvious to anyone who can think, is not original with me. Ayn Rand pointed it out somewhere many decades ago.

The "Trump" Climate Warming Report? NOT!!!

Environmental religionists remain shameless ideologues. That "Trump Administration" climate change "study" is their latest foray into the world of disinformation and hysteria.

Look, we all know this administration is embedded with legions of Obama holdovers and other assorted the-sky-is-falling crackpots and opportunists. So dubbing the recent gloom & doom climate warming report a Trump study is pure fantasy. Did you know that key elements of this "scientific analysis" were the work of one Andrew Light, a hardcore climate warming advocate and, by the way, a philosophy professor with zero science credentials. The "study" was also financed by the notorious brothers grim, Soros and Steyer. But, hey. The money's good. Right, Professor Light?

Perhaps Trump should rattle the cage at the US Office of Global Research (OMG) from which this report seems to have originated and see how many global warming cultists fall out. Then can their butts! Selfless civil servants my a**.